Case Study

Most hiring discussions focus on whether a candidate can do the job. That is a reasonable place to start. But for employers in hospitality, manufacturing, logistics, healthcare, food production, and retail, it is only part of the risk picture. A technically capable employee who steals, misuses substances, files fraudulent workers’ compensation claims, or creates workplace […]

Relying on references is like evaluating a movie only by its trailer—useful, but curated. Former managers want to be helpful (and avoid legal risk), so they share safe, high-level praise. That’s why smart employers don’t rely on references alone; they triangulate behavior (assessments + interviews) with history (verification) to see the real picture. What changes

This integrity screening case study shows how employers reduced turnover, workplace incidents, and hiring risk through smarter assessments. Background: A forward-thinking company encountered a costly setback after hiring a candidate whose background raised several concerns.  Despite an impressive resume, discrepancies emerged: irregular patterns in FMLA usage, conflicting personal documentation, and an anonymous tip hinting at

How employee disengagement increases workplace injuries, lowers productivity, and drives up workers compensation costs. One of the greatest challenges facing modern businesses is employee disengagement. According to a 2022 Gallup report, employee disengagement cost businesses $7.8 trillion globally. These lost productivity costs equated to approximately 11% of the global gross domestic product (GDP). Regardless of